Skip to main content

USCG v. Solomon: New Accusations on Appeal

The US Coast Guard has filed an appeal brief in the matter of USCG v. Solomon.  In this case at the Trial, the expert witness of the USCG- Dr. Hani Khella- stated that urinary creatinine would only decrease in "volcano" and that a week in the desert would not alter urinary creatinine.

The USCG expert, Khella, further stated that there is no way that creatinine would degrees in temperatures less than 300 degrees Celsius. Dr. Khella, apparently getting his information from Wikipedia testified in opposition to the number.  Why he made such a miscalculation of truth, we will never know.

At the trial on the matter, it was admitted that the urine sample was in the desert for over a week.  Simone Solomon presented two experts who testified at trial that urinary creatinine would degrade at temperatures that were natrually occurring in the desert, temperatures of 115 degrees or less.

The USCG has now, upon appeal, introduced for the first time the idea that not only was her urine sample out of whack, but that somehow she intended to defraud the system.  Also on appeal, the USCG has introduced for the first time, the accusation that Simone Solomon produced a urine sample by use of a prosthetic device.  (This despite an absence of nitrates from the sample and a sample that was "in range" temperature wise.)

The USCG has also objected to the amicus brief of Dr. Roger Bertholf, arguing that this brief should have been produced at trial.  This despite the fact that Ms. Solomon had two experts testify on her behalf on this very point at trial!  The USCG seems to fail to understand what an Amicus Curiae is.

The USCG seems be recycling their work from another appeal that is currently pending, that of the USCG v. Carroll, Carroll, a completely unrelated Defendant, was represented at trial by Vuk S. Vujasinovic, Esq., Kenneth B. Fenelon, Jr., Esq., Vujasinovic & Beckcom, P.L.L.C.  I have not spoken to them regarding their currently pending appeal.  The USCG appealed Carroll when they were dissatisfied with a 24 month suspension when Carroll was caught using a prosthetic device.

  By doing so, they have embarrassed themselves and the idea behind an appeal.  They have shown that Ms. Solomon is not a priority.  They have also shown that they did not read the transcripts of the case.  (Transcript 1 - Transcript 2).

Read the Coast Guard appeal brief that they botched and just recycled from Carroll:




Popular posts from this blog

Lying during traffic investigation - Making False Report in Florida

It is a misdemeanor of the second degree, to give false information to the police during an investigation.  It is governed by section 316.067 Florida Statutes.  To give false information at a crash, can be subject to arrest or a notice to appear may be issued to the driver. If you are facing a charge under 316.067, Florida Statutes, call Graham today at 904-383-7448.

The Ethics of Offhand Comments and Belief

_________________________________________________ Phil Robertson (Duck Dynasty): GQ Article: When asked to define sin that is blurring what is right and wrong:  "Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there." Phil Robertson rose to some level of fame through his appearance on the A&E show Duck Dynasty.  By the level of Duck Dynasty merchandise and apparel that is present in gas stations, truck stops, and Walmart in the south, it is apparent that the crew of Duck Dynasty have become leaders in a movement that I can only classify as "redneck." In an GQ magazine interview, Robertson made statements that expressed a negative opinion of homosexuality and homosexuals rooted in his Christian religious belief.  He also made statements that were dismissive of the presence of racism in the Southern states.  A&E suspended Robertson for those comments but has recently been allowed to return to Duck Dynasty to continue his career in reality telev

Trafficking in Cannabis - Florida

Section 893.135 Florida Statutes governs trafficking in Marijuana, cannabis .  A person who is in possession of more than 25 pounts of cannabis, or more than 300 plants into the state, commits a felony.  The minimum term of imprisonment from 25 pounds to 2,000 pounds of cannabis is 3 years including a fine of $25,000.00.  The same is true for persons in possession of more than 300 but less than 2,000 plants. The mandatory minimum term of imprisonment rises to 7 years and a fine of $50,000 for marijuana weighing from 2,000 to 10,000 pounds.  Again, the same is true as a mandatory minimum for 2,000 plants to 10,000 plants.  Over 10,000 pounds or plants, the fine quadruples to $200,000 and the minimum term of imprisonment rises to 15 years. Plants must be considered to have root formation, and root hairs to be considered under the terms of this statute.  Callous tissue on the stalk of a marijuana plant is not readily observable evidence of root formation, but viability or sex of the